Mathies WähnerIT Governance Deutsch
Working together

IT landscape assessment and 90-day steering plan

Ten consulting days spread over three to four weeks. At the end you know which IT decision comes first, which can wait and which cannot be made yet, plus a plan for the following 90 days with a sponsor for each decision.

Designed for managing directors, executive boards, CFOs and CIOs of organizations with roughly 250 to 1,200 employees.

Single questions, as they arrive
In order, on day 10
  1. Decide first
  2. Then
  3. Can wait
  4. Can wait
  5. Cannot be decided today: what is missing, who has it
Schematic. The order comes from scores, weightings, effort and dependencies, not from a single number.
Ten consulting days

on site and remote, within three to four calendar weeks, at a fixed price.

Ninety-day steering plan

Decisions in sequence, a sponsor for each, three checkpoints.

14 to 18 hours

of your organization's time in total, all participants combined, about four of them with the sponsor.

Situation

When the assessment is useful

Decisions arrive one at a time

A provider contract, the budget round, a project that will not finish, a security question: each on its own, with no order and no shared basis.

A date is coming anyway

A contract expiry, a tender, a change in IT leadership or the next budget round. By then it should be clear what to decide first.

Executive management and IT see it differently

One side hears that things are running; the other knows what keeps them running. An evidence-based picture that both can check is the shared basis.

Result

What you have on day 10

  1. The assessment as a presentation for executive management and as a full report
  2. A rating for each domain, with evidence. A domain is a coherent part of the IT landscape, such as workplace, telephony or ERP; six to eight per organization
  3. An accountability map for the domains examined in depth: who decides, who executes, who carries the risk
  4. The page "What cannot be decided today": for each item, what is missing, who has it and how to obtain it
  5. The 90-day steering plan with a sponsor for each decision. The sponsor is the person in your organization who can make that decision and own it
  6. The decision log from the closing meeting
Example

What an assessment looks like

Schematic with example domains and invented values, no client data. Five controllability ratings (1 to 5), two weightings set by the sponsor, and the steering priority derived from them.
DomainOperational stabilityResponsibility and authorityCapacity boundChange loadRisks and dependenciesBusiness criticalityRelevance for next stepsSteering priority
Workplace5435532watch
Telephony3132354now
ERP531335590 days
Network5355442watch
CRM3133245sponsor decides
Security5554553hold
Providers3153344now
5 controllable4321 not controllableweighting
Seven values per domain

Five controllability ratings, each from 1 to 5 and backed by evidence: operational stability; responsibility and authority; capacity tied up in operations; project and change load; risks and dependencies. Plus two weightings set with the sponsor: business criticality and relevance for the next steps.

How the sequence is set

The steering priority comes from ratings, weightings and an estimate of the change effort, together with dependencies between decisions and dates that are coming anyway, such as contract expirations. The lowest rating is a signal, not automatically the first decision.

One value often explains the others

Where a role carries responsibility without the authority to decide, the other values rarely stay stable.

Sequence

How the engagement runs

  1. Day 0

    Your entry question: which decision should be possible on day 10? Documents requested, sponsor meetings fixed.

  2. Day 5

    Mid-point with the sponsor: first picture. You choose the two or three domains to examine in depth, usually from the lowest-rated ones.

  3. Days 9 and 10

    Your IT lead reviews the facts in the report. Then assessment, 90-day steering plan and decision log in the meeting with executive management.

  4. 90 days after

    Three checkpoints you run yourself.

Days 1 to 10 are consulting days, spread over three to four calendar weeks.

Scope

Scope, prerequisites and questions

Scope

Ten consulting days within three to four calendar weeks, mostly on site, at a fixed price plus travel; further days on request at the day rate. The offer fits on one page and follows the first conversation.

Your effort

About 14 to 18 hours across all participants: around four with the sponsor, around six with the IT lead, the rest with two or three business unit heads and one or two providers.

Prerequisites

A sponsor who can decide on the 90-day plan. An IT lead whom the sponsor has informed in advance. A basic set of documents: org chart, legal entities, project list, provider list with contract end dates, IT budget overview, open problem list.

After handover

One round of factual corrections within ten working days is included: figures, system names, roles, dates. Where views still differ, the report records them.

Questions that come up before the start

How does it start?

Before day one you answer one question: which decision should be possible on day 10? The answer is the first acceptance criterion.

What are the ratings based on?

Every rating states what it rests on. The report distinguishes what documents show, what interviewees report, what several sources confirm, and what is an assessment. A document proves what it contains, not that anyone follows it; two matching statements make a claim more likely, not certain. So alongside the number of sources, how current and relevant they are matters. As a minimum rule, no rating rests on a single person's statement alone. Indications of serious risk appear in the report.

What if the IT lead sees the facts differently?

Your IT lead reviews the facts in the report on day 9: figures, system names, responsibilities, time periods. Corrections go in before the closing meeting. The assessment is backed by evidence and open to discussion; where views still differ after review, the decision log records both.

What is not included?

No technical audit and no implementation. The assessment rates structures, controllability and risks. An individual appraisal of staff is not part of this assessment. The report also states what was not examined.

What can follow after day 10?

The plan is yours; you run the checkpoints yourself. Three follow-ons are possible, each as a separate engagement, when the occasion arises: support for the first decisions as a block with a fixed scope; preparation and support for the three checkpoints, with the plan staying your plan; interim IT leadership if the role is vacant or needs relief for a period. If none of these occasions arises, that is a good sign: the plan works with the roles you have.

Contact

Let's talk

If an IT decision is coming up or a role needs covering for a while, pick a time for a first 30-minute conversation. Or send me a note; I reply personally.

The booking calendar is loaded from Calendly. Data is sent to Calendly only once you click; details in the privacy policy.

mw@mathieswaehner.com

Willich near Düsseldorf, Germany · remote and hybrid · German and English